2003 Ford Ka vs. 1986 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mercury Lynx (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 63 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mercury Lynx (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (99 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1986 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ka | Lynx |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2400 mm |