2003 Ford Ka vs. 1992 Mercury Capri
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Capri would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Capri (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Capri should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Capri weights approximately 118 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercury Capri (130 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Mercury Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1992 Mercury Capri | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ka | Capri |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |