2003 Ford Ka vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (169 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 626 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |