2003 Ford Ka vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 88 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Ka (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | Midge |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |