2003 Ford Ka vs. 2000 Morgan Aero 8
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Morgan Aero 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Morgan Aero 8 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Morgan Aero 8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Morgan Aero 8 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 2000 Morgan Aero 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Morgan Aero 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Ka | 2000 Morgan Aero 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Morgan |
| Model | Ka | Aero 8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 260 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 970 kg |
