2003 Ford Ka vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Spyker C8 weights approximately 188 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 2002 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Ford | Spyker |
Model | Ka | C8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.1 seconds | 4.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |