2003 Ford Ka vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 MCC Silverpulse has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 MCC Silverpulse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Ka | Silverpulse |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |