2003 Ford Ka vs. 2005 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 768 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2005 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Ka | Canyon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 93.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 962 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |