2003 Ford Ka vs. 2006 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 715 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka. 2006 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Ka 2006 Jeep Commander
Make Ford Jeep
Model Ka Commander
Year Released 2003 2006
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1299 cc 4703 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 69 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 106 Nm 414 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 101 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 962 kg 1677 kg
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 78 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]