2003 Ford Ka vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Ka 2006 Volkswagen Polo
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Ka Polo
Year Released 2003 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1299 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 69 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 106 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 82.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 92.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Top Speed 167 km/hour 193 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 14.1 seconds 10.1 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 45 L