2003 Ford Ka vs. 2007 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2007 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2007 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Ka | I-290 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 74 L |