2003 Ford Ka vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Ka (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |