2003 Ford Ka vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 241 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka. 2012 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Ka | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Ka | RS3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |