2003 Ford Ka vs. 2012 Land Rover Freelander

To start off, 2012 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Freelander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Ka 2012 Land Rover Freelander
Make Ford Land Rover
Model Ka Freelander
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1299 cc 2179 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 69 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 106 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.5 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 16.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Top Speed 167 km/hour 181 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 14.1 seconds 10.9 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3630 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2670 mm