2003 Ford Laser vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2003 Ford Laser is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 211 kg more than 2003 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Laser. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Laser | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Laser | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
