2003 Ford Lynx vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2003 Ford Lynx is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2003 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Ford Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Lynx | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Lynx | Tiger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2190 mm |