2003 Ford Lynx vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2003 Ford Lynx is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2003 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 410 kg more than 2003 Ford Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Lynx | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Lynx | 240 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2740 mm |
