2003 Ford Maverick vs. 1956 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2003 Ford Maverick is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Maverick weights approximately 338 kg more than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Maverick. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Maverick | 1956 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Maverick | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |