2003 Ford Maverick vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2003 Ford Maverick is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Maverick weights approximately 156 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2003 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Maverick | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Maverick | Cougar |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4728 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |