2003 Ford Maverick vs. 1971 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2003 Ford Maverick is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 4,141 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Holden Monaro (182 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Maverick weights approximately 138 kg more than 1971 Holden Monaro.
Because 2003 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Holden Monaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Monaro (356 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Maverick. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1971 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Maverick | 1971 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Maverick | Monaro |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4141 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 356 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |