2003 Ford Maverick vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2003 Ford Maverick is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 244 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Maverick weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2003 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Maverick | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Maverick | CLK |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 367 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 88 L |