2003 Ford Maverick vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2003 Ford Maverick. (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Because 2003 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Maverick. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Maverick | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Maverick | C70 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |