2003 Ford Model U vs. 1957 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2003 Ford Model U is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Jaguar XK (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Jaguar XK (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1957 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Model U | 1957 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Model U | XK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
