2003 Ford Model U vs. 1974 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2003 Ford Model U is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 213 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Model U | 1974 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | Ford | Datsun |
| Model | Model U | 260Z |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1290 mm |
