2003 Ford Model U vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Ford Model U is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Model U (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U should accelerate faster than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Model U | 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Model U | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1360 mm |
