2003 Ford Model U vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (340 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Model U | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Model U | XC90 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |