2003 Ford Model U vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Model U is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Model U | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Model U | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1311 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1350 mm |
