2003 Ford Model U vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Model U | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Model U | XJ |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |