2003 Ford Model U vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (231 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Model U | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Model U | LR2 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 231 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 317 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |