2003 Ford Model U vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Model U | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Model U | BLS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2792 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
