2003 Ford Model U vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac SRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac SRX (302 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Model U | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Model U | SRX |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6950 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1669 mm |
