2003 Ford Model U vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Model U. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Model U would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (184 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Model U | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Model U | CR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 184 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1645 mm |