2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 806 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Ardea 3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 28 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 6.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |