2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1950 Maserati 4CLT
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. (276 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 872 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1950 Maserati 4CLT | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Mustang | 4CLT |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |