2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1950 Talbot T 26. (276 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 577 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Mustang | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |
