2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 930 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Mustang | A6G |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 550 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |
