2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 23 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. 2003 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Super Wasp has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Ford Mustang 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
Make Ford Hudson
Model Mustang Super Wasp
Year Released 2003 1953
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4601 cc 4293 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 305 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 434 Nm 349 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 7.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1576 kg 1599 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 5160 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3030 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]