2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1960 Suzuki Light
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 1960 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1122 kg more than 1960 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 496 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1960 Suzuki Light | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | Light |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
