2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1961 Saab 750
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Saab 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Saab 750 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1961 Saab 750. (48 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1961 Saab 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 627 kg more than 1961 Saab 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Saab 750, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Saab 750. (84 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Saab 750.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1961 Saab 750 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Mustang | 750 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 556 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |