2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 336 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Mustang | EK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
