2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Maserati 151

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Maserati 151. (355 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Maserati 151. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 597 kg more than 1962 Maserati 151. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Maserati 151. (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Maserati 151.

Compare all specifications: