2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Honda F1
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Honda F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Honda F1 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1964 Honda F1. (217 HP @ 12000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Honda F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 976 kg more than 1964 Honda F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1964 Honda F1 | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Mustang | F1 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 12000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 504 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2310 mm |
