2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 465 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 220 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 556 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |