2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 320 more horse power than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 546 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lancia Fulvia. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1966 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Fulvia |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 934 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |