2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1969 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1969 Pontiac Firebird. (320 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1969 Pontiac Firebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2 kg more than 1969 Pontiac Firebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1969 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Mustang | Firebird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 320 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |