2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Renault 15
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 15 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 1972 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 515 kg more than 1972 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ford Mustang | 1972 Renault 15 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | 15 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 556 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 69 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |