2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 373 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 519 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 556 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
