2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1973 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP) has 347 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 496 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: