2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1976 Subaru 1400 | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Mustang | 1400 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1361 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
