2003 Ford Mustang vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 664 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ford Mustang | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 616 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
